<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WHWG &#124; White House Writers Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whwg.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whwg.com</link>
	<description>Effective Messages. Clear Results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:49:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Nuclear Pause</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/11/the-nuclear-pause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/11/the-nuclear-pause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark W. Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[By Service or Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two White House Writers, G. Philip Hughes and Mark Davis, in a groundbreaking piece express concern about continuing reductions in U.S. nuclear forces in a world in which China and Russia are rapidly modernizing their forces, and proliferation is increasing. This is a special concern, since the United States is the only nuclear power in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two White House Writers, G. Philip Hughes and Mark Davis, in a groundbreaking <a href="http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/nov/2/rethinking-the-zero-option/">piece </a>express concern about continuing reductions in U.S. nuclear forces in a world in which China and Russia are rapidly modernizing their forces, and proliferation is increasing. This is a special concern, since the United States is the only nuclear power in the world that has relinquished its ability to serially manufacture new nuclear weapons.  Hence, their call for a &#8220;Nuclear Pause&#8221; on new reductions agreements, and a &#8220;Plateau&#8221; in overall force levels.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/11/the-nuclear-pause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dealing with Defense Contraction</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/10/dealing-with-defense-contraction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/10/dealing-with-defense-contraction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WHWG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the DoD budget declines, contractors are going to have to look beyond what they are now hearing from the customer (the Pentagon, the military services and Congress) and think hard about what their customers will likely need in the near future.  In this Defense News piece, WHWG&#8217;s Philip Hughes and Mark Davis look to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the DoD budget declines, contractors are going to have to look beyond what they are now hearing from the customer (the Pentagon, the military services and Congress) and think hard about what their customers will likely need in the near future.  In <a href="http://defensenews.com/story.php?i=7784843">this Defense News piece</a>, WHWG&#8217;s Philip Hughes and Mark Davis look to the challenge contractors face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/10/dealing-with-defense-contraction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy and The Cookies Jar</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/privacy-and-the-cookies-jar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/privacy-and-the-cookies-jar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark W. Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook is now facing a likely federal investigation following the revelation that its cookies can track users Web surfing after they logged out of the world’s most popular social networking site.  The worst outcome of such an investigation would be onerous legislation that would stifle innovation. The call for the Federal Trade Commission to investigate, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook is now facing a likely <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/facebook-tracking-prompts-calls-for-ftc-investigation/2011/09/29/gIQAVdsP8K_story.html">federal investigation</a> following the revelation that its cookies can track users Web surfing after they logged out of the world’s most popular social networking site.  The worst outcome of such an investigation would be onerous legislation that would stifle innovation.</p>
<p>The call for the Federal Trade Commission to investigate, however, is a positive sign for people who care about privacy <em>and</em> innovation.  While the FCC is notorious for seeking to employ powers it does not statutorily possess, the FTC has a long record of judicious use of its power.  Regulation of some sort is inevitable in the privacy arena.  Best it be a one-stop shop at the FTC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/privacy-and-the-cookies-jar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Tracking</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/1760/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/1760/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark W. Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook is almost certainly telling the truth when it says it made an inadvertent mistake when it placed cookies on our machines that can track where we go on the Web by our unique identifier. Facebook is also probably telling the truth when it says that has not stored or used this information. The fact [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2042573/Facebook-privacy-row-Social-network-giant-admits-bugs.html">Facebook</a> is almost certainly telling the truth when it says it made an inadvertent mistake when it placed cookies on our machines that can track where we go on the Web by our unique identifier.</p>
<p>Facebook is also probably telling the truth when it says that has not stored or used this information.</p>
<p>The fact remains, what can be done, will be done.  The current privacy paradigm is simply not sustainable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/1760/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Santorum Google Bomb</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/the-santorum-google-bomb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/the-santorum-google-bomb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark W. Davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians pass laws, but that doesn’t mean they understand them. Presidential hopeful Rick Santorum is justifiably upset by a Google bomb that links searches for his name to something too disgusting to repeat here.  In demanding that Google take it down, however, Santorum does not seem to understand that all the responsibility—and liability—rests with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politicians pass laws, but that doesn’t mean they understand them.</p>
<p>Presidential hopeful Rick Santorum is justifiably upset by a Google bomb that links searches for his name to something too disgusting to repeat here.  In demanding that Google take it down, however, Santorum does not seem to understand that all the responsibility—and liability—rests with the webmaster, not the search engine—in a law that passed when he was a member of the Senate<em>.  (Anybody out there know how Senator Santorum voted on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act?)</em></p>
<p>Santorum, however, does strike at a point.</p>
<p>“I suspect if something was up there like that about Joe Biden, they’d get rid of it,” he said.  In fact, something was ‘up there’ about First Lady Michelle Obama, a truly offensive image.  Google did act against one site carrying that image, citing malware concerns, and placed <a href="http://www.google.com/resultsinfo.html">an ad</a> explaining its stance.  Technology companies will need to remain utterly consistent in how they apply these rules—and clear to the public how they operate.  Politicians need to understand the need to play by the rules they themselves have passed.</p>
<p>To learn more about the impact of Section 230 on Google bombs, check out my book, <em><a href="http://www.digitalassassinationbook.com/">Digital Assassination</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/09/the-santorum-google-bomb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Job Opening: Communications Associate</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/07/job-opening-communications-associate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/07/job-opening-communications-associate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>WHWG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you the type of person that likes to be part of a diverse team and enjoys juggling multiple projects at once?   Are you interested in public policy and its impact on the corporate world?  Are you anxious to kick-start your career by diving head first into a fast-paced office with a really wide-range of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you the type of person that likes to be part of a diverse team and enjoys juggling multiple projects at once?   Are you interested in public policy and its impact on the corporate world?  Are you anxious to kick-start your career by diving head first into a fast-paced office with a really wide-range of clients?</p>
<p>If so, then you are invited to submit your resume for our Communications Associate position.  We are a small D.C. strategic communications firm, founded by Republicans.  We craft communications for major corporations and foundations and develop broad campaigns in support of their objectives.</p>
<p>We are looking for a skilled researcher who can use tools like Lexis-Nexis and be proficient with Excel and PowerPoint.  A demonstrable knowledge of social media is a big plus.  Responsibilities will include research, list building, event planning, social media outreach and occasional administrative work.  Salary is commensurate with experience.  Position to start immediately.</p>
<p>Please submit your resume to whwgjobs@gmail.com.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/07/job-opening-communications-associate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analyzing Campaign Speechwriting on Norwegian TV</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/analyzing-campaign-speechwriting-on-norwegian-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/analyzing-campaign-speechwriting-on-norwegian-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clark S. Judge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/rSkNDR8nVmc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/analyzing-campaign-speechwriting-on-norwegian-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOX BUSINESS: The Treasury Department and the bond market</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/fox-business-the-treasury-department-and-the-bond-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/fox-business-the-treasury-department-and-the-bond-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clark S. Judge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After writing this column on the Treasury Department for HughHewitt.com, I was invited to appear on Fox Business to discuss the future of the bond market. Watch the latest video at video.foxbusiness.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After writing <a href="http://www.clarkjudge.org/2011/06/13/smoke-signals-from-the-treasury-department-hughhewitt-com-06-13-11/">this column</a> on the Treasury Department for HughHewitt.com, I was invited to appear on Fox Business to discuss the future of the bond market. </p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/embed.js?id=1000154026001&#038;w=466&#038;h=263"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com">video.foxbusiness.com</a></noscript></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/fox-business-the-treasury-department-and-the-bond-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOX BUSINESS: The modern mid east crisis &amp; Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/fox-business-lessons-for-the-modern-mid-east-crisis-from-ronald-reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/fox-business-lessons-for-the-modern-mid-east-crisis-from-ronald-reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clark S. Judge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch the latest video at video.foxbusiness.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/embed.js?id=4515789&#038;w=466&#038;h=263"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxbusiness.com">video.foxbusiness.com</a></noscript></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/fox-business-lessons-for-the-modern-mid-east-crisis-from-ronald-reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tonys producers to TV audience: Let me entertain you</title>
		<link>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/tonys-producers-to-tv-audience-let-me-entertain-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/tonys-producers-to-tv-audience-let-me-entertain-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Allan Golombek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whwg.com/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night&#8217;s Tony Awards reminds me of an interesting question: What makes the Tonys consistently the best of the showbiz awards shows? (An opinion&#160;backed up by the fact that the annual Broadway Awards show wins so many Emmys.) 1. They focus on what people care about. They only present the &#8216;big&#8217; awards during the actual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><P>Last night&#8217;s Tony Awards reminds me of an interesting question: <SPAN class="mceItemHidden">What makes the <SPAN class="mceItemHiddenSpellWord">Tonys</SPAN> consistently the best of the showbiz awards shows? (An opinion</SPAN>&nbsp;backed up by the fact that the annual Broa<SPAN class="mceItemHidden">dway Awards show wins so many <SPAN class="mceItemHiddenSpellWord">Emmys</SPAN>.)</SPAN></P><br />
<P>1. They focus on what people care about. They only present the &#8216;big&#8217; awards during the actual televised program &#8212; awards like Best Musical, Best Play, Best Actor and Actress in each of those categories, Best Revival. The rest of the awards &#8212; such as costume design &#8212; are pre<SPAN class="mceItemHidden">sented earlier, with the winners announced during the actual show. If they&nbsp;went through the whole process (presenters , presenters open</SPAN> the envelope, announcing the winner, hearing the winner&#8217;s speech) for&nbsp;<EM>every single award</EM>, they would&nbsp;be on all night &#8212; to a continually shrinking home audience.</P><br />
<P>2. They are unique &#8212; they offer something&nbsp;people don&#8217;t normally get.&nbsp;One of live theatre&#8217;s&nbsp;few advantages&nbsp;compared to movies and television is that the theatrical product is&nbsp;something people don&#8217;t get to see every day. When most people see a&nbsp;musical number from, say,&nbsp;<EM><SPAN class="mceItemHidden">Book of <SPAN class="mceItemHiddenSpellWord">Morman</SPAN></SPAN></EM><SPAN class="mceItemHidden">,&nbsp;they are seeing something&nbsp;new to them. That&#8217;s not like the Oscars or the <SPAN class="mceItemHiddenSpellWord">Emmys</SPAN>, where we have seen the movies or TV shows already, or where the clips are slightly longer versions of scenes we have already</SPAN>&nbsp;seen in ads.</P><br />
<P><SPAN class="mceItemHidden">3. The <SPAN class="mceItemHiddenSpellWord">Tonys</SPAN></SPAN>&nbsp;are entertaining. This&nbsp;is partly a natural follow-on from points 1 and 2 above. Spending less time on the secondary categories leaves more time to entertain the home audience. And because they are offering something different, it&nbsp;has more entertainment value.</P><br />
<P><SPAN class="mceItemHidden">But more than this, the <SPAN class="mceItemHiddenSpellWord">Tonys</SPAN> make a&nbsp;</SPAN><EM>big effort </EM>to entertain. They re<SPAN class="mceItemHidden"><SPAN class="mceItemHiddenSpellWord">alize</SPAN> w</SPAN>hat&nbsp;some awards show producers don&#8217;t seem to &#8212; bore your audience for one minute and you lose them for the rest of the night.</P><br />
<P><SPAN class="mceItemHidden">When you add it up, the Tonys&#8217; follow the same formula that makes sense for any speech, or any effective <SPAN class="mceItemHiddenSpellWord">communciations</SPAN> product: Focus on what people care about, offer a unique pro</SPAN>duct or message, and&nbsp;entertain the audience.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whwg.com/2011/06/tonys-producers-to-tv-audience-let-me-entertain-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

